LinkedIn | Senior SWE | Onsite | USA | PASSED
Anonymous User
4287

Hey all,

Giving back to the community. 4 rounds: 1 System design, 1 coding system design, 1 pure LC coding, 1 Manager/Behaviour round. All 4 rounds were 1 hour in duration.

Round #1: System Design

  • Q: LinkedIn users can share posts with each other and externally (outside of LinkedIn). Design a system that tracks the top N shared posts by the following time-intervals; 1 minute, 1 hour, and 1 day.
    • Get requirements, assumptions, constraints, etc.
      • What is this system expected to do? Are all of the events generated for us? Are we only building the ingestion engine + DB for queries?
      • What is the number of users/posts/activity?
      • Do we care more about accuracy or speed of metrics?
    • High-Level
      • What does the events look like? How do we store it? How do we process it in the DB?
      • Do we want pre-process before into DB? Or let aggregation engine perform the computation during query time?
    • Low-Level
      • Talked about all the tables in the DB
      • Talked about how do we store the events in the DB.
      • Talked about how will the aggregation engine query for these results
      • Talked about the API calls that will access the DB
      • Talked about the amount of read/write ratios
  • Overall: Felt good, interviewer was satisfied with answers.

Round #2: Coding System Design

  • Q: https://leetcode.com/problems/all-oone-data-structure/
    • I have not seen this question before. Literally spent 30+ minutes thinking of the designs in my head of how to do this.
      • Ended up with a Bucket DLL to store the keys for the frequency.
      • Also utilized a hashmap to keep track of bucket nodes that we currently have
  • Overall: WTF, who asks this in an interview?? Felt good that I came to the solution on my own, but didn't get to finish implementing all of the functionalities

Round #3: Pure LC Coding

  • Q: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-product-subarray/
    • I did this question about 2 years ago, so when I saw it, I actually didn't even remember it. Didn't need hints, but took awhile to get to the optimal solution
  • Overall: Felt okay. Interviewer was satisfied, even though I took awhile.

Round #4: Manager Interview

  • Bunch of Tell me about a time....
  • Good round, felt like we were laughing and just hitting it off. Really dived down into my projects and what I'm currently doing.
  • Overall: Felt good, hopefully Manager felt the same.

Overall: Some of the questions were just...so unrealistic to expect an interviewee to get in an hour (if you haven't seen it). But overall decent experience.

RESULTS: They've requested another coding round because of my 2nd round (coding system design).

Round #5: Additional Pure LC Coding

UPDATED RESULTS: PASSED AND GOT AN OFFER

Comments (13)