Eventbrite Interview Experience – SWE II
Anonymous User
378

Company: Eventbrite
Role: Software Engineer II – Full Stack
Interview Format: 5 Rounds


1. HackerRank Test

Type: Online Coding Assessment
Duration: 1 hour
Platform: HackerRank

  • The problem involved creating an adapter class to convert responses from a third-party API to match the company’s pagination format.
  • The question tested understanding of OOP principles, clean code, and some backend concepts.

I passed this round and was invited to interviews.


2. HR / Recruiter Introductory Call

Duration: 30 minutes

  • Recruiter introduced themselves and asked for my self-introduction.

  • Discussion focused on:

    • Current notice period (they preferred <30 days).
    • Salary expectations
    • Why Eventbrite?
    • My current role, tech stack, and day-to-day responsibilities.
    • Preference between frontend vs backend.
    • A time when I went above and beyond for a customer.
    • The engineering process and team structure at my current company.

This was a non-technical round but quite thorough to assess motivation and team fit.


3. Hiring Manager Round

Type: Technical + Behavioural
Duration: 1 hour

  • Mixed focus on technical depth, past experience, and alignment with Eventbrite’s values.

  • Topics included:

    • Why Eventbrite?
    • My work on previous projects and decisions made.
    • Situational and behavioural questions mapped to their core values.
  • Interviewer wanted to understand ownership, collaboration, and problem-solving mindset.


4 & 5. Final Rounds (Back-to-Back)

Duration: 2 hours total (1 hour each + 5-minute break in between)

4. System Design Round

Type: Full Stack Design
Duration: 1 hour

  • Problem Statement: Design a user management system

    • Admin should be able to:

      • View all users
      • Search users by name and DOB
      • Edit user details
    • Users should be able to:

      • Register
      • View and edit their own profile
  • Covered both frontend architecture (admin and user views) and backend APIs, data models, and search functionality and database designs.


5. Code Maintainability Round

Platform: HackerRank
Duration: 1 hour

  • Given a poorly written codebase (with bad OOP practices and tight coupling).

  • Asked to:

    • Refactor it to follow good object-oriented principles
    • Make it more maintainable, testable, and extensible

Final Verdict: Rejected

Comments (3)