Please unrate Weekly 196 or rejudge problem4, stop providing low quality constraints
2096

Hello LeetCode Support Team

You un-rate Biweekly 29 because of issue on Q4, https://leetcode.com/discuss/general-discussion/708963/Please-unrate-Biweekly-29-or-rejudge-problem4-stop-providing-low-quality-testcases
Weak testcase misled people to provide wrong solutions.

Here comes again, there is an issue on Weekly 196 Q4, https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-possible-integer-after-at-most-k-adjacent-swaps-on-digits/discuss/720215/The-constraint-was-not-very-helpful
Meaningless constraints misled peopel to provide better solutions than brute force but actually you accept brute force.

Please un-rate this too. Or please provide a clear strategy which issue you will unrate.
Thanks

I know it's really hard to be perfect on each contest, but you guys should have a guide of which contest should we unrate, otherwise this may happens on every contest, then no one will join a contest again.
IMO, above two questions is not perfect, but they could somehow filter good people(but also include some bad people), I think unrate or not are both fine. It's kinda unfair, but how you know people copy solutions from the internet? It's a balance problem, hope you guys could find the point.

Comments (16)