It came as a surprise to me that the Weekly 400 is not unrated. But someone told me this:\n![image](https://assets.leetcode.com/users/images/b00be694-8bf0-4982-899f-942091a52f46_1717635664.3083317.png)\n\nHowever, I still think it is hardly reasonable. Actually, the technical issue already leads to a significant disadvantage.\n\nAs we can see, there were already many contestants who AK-ed the round while some of the contestants in LCUS hadn\'t even got to see the problems. But as the rule said, it was not called "a significant disadvantage", which is really surprising and hard to believe. If my rank fall from top 30 to top 100, it is already causing a terrible rating dropdown, and it isn\'t even my fault.\n\nAnd, I\'ve already recorded my competing experiece, here it is:\n\nhttps://www.bilibili.com/video/BV111421y7kq/?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0\n\nAnd the submissions of this round can be shown here, which is clearly abnormal:\n\nhttps://lccn.lbao.site/predicted/weekly-contest-400\n\n![image](https://assets.leetcode.com/users/images/e16ada8e-9a35-4a3a-b9a0-99562e031b27_1717652227.1703644.png)\n\nCheck the result of Weekly 398 for comparison:\n\nhttps://lccn.lbao.site/predicted/weekly-contest-398\n\n![image](https://assets.leetcode.com/users/images/0f293916-d748-4b9f-b17d-315a4df581c8_1717652268.8720942.png)\n

It came as a surprise to me that the Weekly 400 is not unrated. But someone told me this:\n\n\nHowever, I still think it is hardly reasonable. Actually, the tec